Talk:1RXS J160929.1−210524

sun-like
Apparently this is not necessarily the first imaged. See Also why doesn't the article mention failed binary system and captured proto-star as possible formation avenues? 75.41.110.200 (talk) 13:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * On the subject of the position of the planet and the position at which it formed, the two could be different because of a planet being traded by passing stars. The relative velocity of passing stars can be near the escape velocity as is that of Proxima Centauri relative to A & B.  Such a trading of planets would be a rare event, but considering the number of possible rare events that could conceivably be seen, the surprising occurrence would be a failure to see any rare events.  I do not know where to find references for any of this.  --Fartherred (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Size?
I remember reading that any planet from the mass of Jupiter all the way up to a brown dwarf star should be about the same size as Jupiter. Is this true here, at least as much as the luminosity can tell us? Wnt (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on 1RXS J160929.1−210524. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100630110925/http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/blogs/astronomy/2010/06/22/astronomers-verify-directly-imaged-planet.aspx to http://cs.astronomy.com/asycs/blogs/astronomy/2010/06/22/astronomers-verify-directly-imaged-planet.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)