Talk:2-Pyrrolidone

Possible merge with Pyrrolididones
I disagree strongly with merging these two articles. In fact I support the separate articles for all the derivatives of 2-Pyrrolidone... they vary widely in chemical structure as well as pharmacological properties. Even if the derivatives from this chemical are related to it, this one is different enough that it deserves its own article. Articles like this are very useful to those interested in pharmacology no matter how brief.Brooks bonkoksi (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

I agree that the articles could or should be merged. It looks like the 2-pyrrolididone article has more content, though it would likely make sense to have the title be Pyrrolididone, and have 2-pyrrolididone be discussed as part of the article. Creating distinct stubs for each of the specific examples is a separate issue. User: