Talk:2.0 (soundtrack)

Merger proposal
I propose 2.0 (score) to be merged into 2.0 (soundtrack). It seems like a typical case of WP:CFORK. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Concur - fails WP:NALBUM easily.  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)


 * , I wonder whether 2.0 (soundtrack) itself passes WP:NALBUM. Everything was fine here, then 1 user decided to create a separate article for the soundtracks and 2-3 other users soon followed with their own FORK of the FORK. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , They've created a fair number of soundtrack articles. Some of them I think pass GNG but fail NALBUM.  That's usually enough for a keep, I believe.  They need to better about finding sources, avoid the promotional tone and hype and the junk links, but all in all, it's better than some in this area.  The 2.0 soundtrack one is borderline - it may be worth seeing about extra eyes / thoughts from ICTF.  Ravensfire  (talk) 17:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your inputs. Did you post it at ICTF? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 13:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)