Talk:2/31st Battalion (Australia)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 06:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * No disamb links
 * External links ok
 * which it took part in a number of battles - took part in several battles
 * Reworded per your suggestion. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The battle honours could be linked to the battles - but will not prevent promoting
 * Added links to them. Some of them are only contained within campaign articles at the moment, though. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

On hold
Well done as normal, I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, Jim, thanks for the review. I've responded to the couple of points above. Are there any that I've missed? If you could let me know today or tomorrow, that would be great, as I finally have a free weekend from work, so can use it to make any other adjustments you believe are necessary. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)