Talk:2000 Football League Second Division play-off final/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Any comments are welcome. LegoKontribsTalkM 23:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:


 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * B. Focused:


 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Thanks for reviewing my article -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Could You put in a "See Also" section with links to the 2 team's articles, and leagues articles. LegoKontribsTalkM 21:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Done that, hope it looks OK - ChrisTheDude (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually I was wrong about that, but Peanut4, already reverted.  Congratulations, I will now pass it. LegoKontribsTalkM 03:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)