Talk:2000 French Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Any number between one and twelve should be spelled out.
 * Corrected the number issue Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The pictures of Coulthard and Häkkinen could be moved down a little, but it's not a deal-breaker.
 * Done Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass:
 * Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.-- Nascar   king  19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Then I hereby give 2000 French Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.-- Nascar   king  19:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Pass:
 * Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.-- Nascar   king  19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Then I hereby give 2000 French Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.-- Nascar   king  19:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)