Talk:2000 Hungarian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs) 22:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Dawnseeker2000 and I'll be reviewing this article. There will be some time to get a start on it today, but as I'm a fairly inexperienced reviewer, this may take some time. The good news is that the article looks great; very well organized and nice to look at. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000   22:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article has a great presentation. It's neat with nice full paragraphs and has good continuity.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I made several small improvements to the text, but overall, the word usage in the article has been done well.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I swapped one reference (for the Minardi drivers qualifying last) but all other spot checks were fine.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I find that for an average F1 race with not too much off the beaten path, this article is complete in its description of the events.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Again, the article reads well. Just the facts; and there are a lot of them. Good job.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images of Hakkinen and Shumacher have CC licenses.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm passing this article. I still prefer to watch the races, but this is a good read.
 * I'm passing this article. I still prefer to watch the races, but this is a good read.

Good work on this article. I'm promoting it. Dawnseeker2000  03:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)