Talk:2001 Avjet Gulfstream III crash/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article is being reviewed as part of the WikiProject Good Articles. We're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. This article was awarded GA-status back in 2006, so I will be assessing the article to ensure that it is still compliant against WP:WIAGA. Pyrotec (talk) 21:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Initial review
The main problem with this article appears to be lack of WP:Verification, i.e items 2(a) and 2(b).


 * Flight history -
 * Entirely unreferenced.


 * Investigation and final report -
 * There are direct quotations that are unreferenced.


 * Aftermath -
 * There are direct quotations that are unreferenced.


 * References -
 * Reference 1 is a 41 page report (as a pdf file), no page numbers are cited.

Pyrotec (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 21:58 17 September 2009

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

As no corrective action has been attempted I'm Delisting this article. The article can, of course, be resubmitted to WP:GAN but hopefully after the non-comliances have been addressed. Pyrotec (talk) 13:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)