Talk:2001 Rockingham 500/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR   15:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "Bräck, the season points leader heading into the race was awarded the pole position" - might read better with em dashes, but feel free to ignore...
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * "The race was due to be held over 210 laps originally but was reduced to 168" - is there a given reason?
 * It was the event's schedule had to be compacted because of the problems in the previous two days MWright96 (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * " and was held on 22 September at the Rockingham Motor Speedway in Corby, Northamptonshire, England, United Kingdom" - too many. I would personally just write "Corby, Northamptonshire", but I'll leave it up to you
 * I've removed United Kingdom from the sentence. MWright96 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * "Kniefel had reduced the number of laps to be run from 168 to 140 because of the danger from fading sunlight" - this could be mentioned in the lead also
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

This meets the GA criteria as it is. Couldn't find anything wrong with it! JAG UAR   21:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)