Talk:2002 in film

Release Date conventions
Dates should be written in full, e.g. December 3 rather than 12/03, which is ambiguous, because this is probably interpreted as 12 March in many places outside the US. Lexor 05:30 May 14, 2003 (UTC)


 * Not just that. Who cares on what date About a Boy was released in the United States? This film was released in England on April 26, 2002. This is a nuisance. --KF 09:55 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)


 * Agree, that removes any confusion. RoyBatty42 19:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Since I don't get any replies from members or users who have done tables in the latest years, I post here this. "Films released in 2002" contains all films found in "Years in film" that were released in 2002 in their place of origin. This is how other lists enter dates and it is very confusing to search each entry for actual year of release. So I have done this work to facilitate either users adding films (you may have seen that often there are broken cells in tables, due to later additions), or members trying to cross lists' entries, so that sometime, we may end up having comprehensive information on existing or non-existing articles and make our lists sub-projects worth the effort. I do not remove any repeated entries on other tables, but the headers should indicate the specific nature of the list. English talking people do not live in North America only. Hoverfish 13:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Events removed
Removed this: I debate that this rises to the level of a notable event for the year outside of Trekker circles, not to mention it is now false as Paramount is doing a new Trek film with JJ Abrams writing and possibly directing. RoyBatty42 19:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * December - Star Trek: Nemesis, the tenth film in the successful film franchise, opens to poor box office and lukewarm reviews. It is later announced that this film is expected to be the final Star Trek film for the foreseeable future.

Excess info
The films should be the only thing listed with only a few notations for MAJOR awards or critical information (like noteworthy reissues). RoyBatty42 19:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Missing info?
Um, what happened to October-December? 192.234.13.40 13:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The section was created, but it never had any data. --Sigma 7 (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I forgot Film Debuts
Should you forgot Film Debuts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:8500:472:942D:EF08:4457:C72E (talk) 23:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Universal Pictures
If they had their 75th anniversary in 1990, then 2002 would have been their 87th, not 90th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wes Maestro Williams (talk • contribs) 19:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Debuts
Can you want to change from the empty one to the one similar to 2004 in film — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C8:C001:8A3A:EC32:F4A8:944:19DD (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

"2002 film" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2002 film and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Stuart Little 2
What are all these references to Stuart Little 2?? I don’t think it made 3 billion dollars- that’s not backed up by the source cited. 2603:8000:2700:2943:90B9:2528:B584:B75F (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

"2002 film" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2002 film and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 20 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)