Talk:2003 Insight Bowl/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:2003 Insight Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Some very minor issues with judgements on play results... i.e.: "Unfortunately for the Bears..." but otherwise maintains equal focus on both teams without cheerleading for either.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A very well written article. Compares well with existing GA articles on single games. Resolute 18:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A very well written article. Compares well with existing GA articles on single games. Resolute 18:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * A very well written article. Compares well with existing GA articles on single games. Resolute 18:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)