Talk:2004 California Proposition 71

Quotes
There seem to be a lot of phrases in "quotes" throughout the article, but it is unclear who or what is being quoted. The quotes either need removed or properly attributed. Peyna 00:10, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Relevance
I think the impact of paying back 3 billion dollars plus interest in bonds is worth mentioning for such an indebted state. Also, I think it should be mentioned somewhere that the state has yet to benefit in anyway from this expenditure. - Schrandit 16:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on California Proposition 71 (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051123065710/http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/stemcell/chapter1.html to http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/stemcell/chapter1.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051228202226/http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/stemcell/chapter2.html to http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/stemcell/chapter2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on California Proposition 71 (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522165630/http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71-title.htm to http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71-title.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522165854/http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71text.pdf to http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71text.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522165854/http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71text.pdf to http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71text.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522160317/http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71-analysis.htm to http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71-analysis.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522165630/http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71-title.htm to http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/past/2004/general/propositions/prop71-title.htm
 * Added tag to http://archive.healthvote.org/71/moneywatch.php?pid=71&sid=3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051201031534/http://www.cirm.ca.gov/icoc/ to http://www.cirm.ca.gov/icoc/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051124132853/http://bioethics.gov/reports/stemcell/index.html to http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/stemcell/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Could we move some of this content to CIRM page?
Hello, some of this content seems to me to be more appropriate for the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine page than here - specifically, the sections on The new institute and Background would really add clarity to the page about the agency; instead, they are buried here in the details of a state ballot proposition. I Would it be ok if I (or someone else) moved them? SENsters (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)