Talk:2004 attack on Istanbul restaurant

Comments
Was it a Jewish masonic lodge - or just a masonic lodge? Secretlondon 23:13, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

No mention of Jewish in the external link. Secretlondon 23:18, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Also it was a restaurant (frequented by Freemasons) and not a Masonic lodge --Decumanus 23:20, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I wrote the page and would like to talk just made a screen name djkra. how do i talk on this page?

I was wrong in saying that it was a jewish lodge. I found this online.

Many Jewish businessmen and intellectuals are believed to belong to Turkey's five masonic organizations, which have some 14,000 members.

Reason for title namechange - it was too darn long, not to mention silly. - SV (talk) 19:54, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC) Bold text

How could both this attack and the Madrid train bombings be 911 days after 9/11? There must be a mistake in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.65.122 (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposed move
I propose to move this article to March 9, 2004 attack on Istanbul restaurant (changing 'of' to 'on') in accordance with normal English usage. Are there any other considerations before I proceed? --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 10:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * In the absence of dissent I'm going ahead with the move. Per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA the new name accords with the requirement of 'naturalness', which is lacking in the old title March 9, 2004 attack of Istanbul restaurant. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 10:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I would suggest moving it to something like 2004 Istanbul restaurant attack, which is much more natural than the current title. I realize this is many years after the previous move, but the current title is a mess. Paris1127 (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)