Talk:2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jason Rees (talk · contribs) 01:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Hurricanehink, I am going to attempt to review this article for GAN.Jason Rees (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * First off all most if not all of the other seasonal articles have the timeline image, on top of the seasonal summary section rather than below it.
 * True, not sure why it was done this way. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * During the season - what season?
 * It's synonymous with "the year". ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * storms - might be better to use the general term here and call them cyclonic disturbances
 * Sounds good. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * No systems strengthened beyond cyclonic storm status - If so why is Fanoos classified on the timeline as a severe cyclonic storm?
 * Beats me, I fixed it. Could have been a typo. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Might be good to see a basic summary - take 1990 as a basic example of what i mean
 * I disagree, respectfully. There is a basic summary in the lead already. No need for an additional one in the SS. 1990 could probably use its summary for its lead (which is only one paragraph long). ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Hibaru could do with a few tweaks to make it more readable IMO.
 * I believe I got this. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Try changing The convection consolidated as an elongated circulation became evident. to Over the next few days the convection consolidated as an elongated.... I suggest this as I feel like the reader needs some concept to time here.Jason Rees (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Good idea. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Dead link - 2005 IMD ATCR
 * Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Im surprised Land Depression 1 and BOB 02 have sections, I suspect they could be put into the other systems section quite easily.
 * I moved BOB 02, since it was very short. Land Depression 1 has two paragraphs, so I opted to keep it separate.


 * Generally speaking I think its better if you do not mention the winds in depressions/deep depressions in this basin its only either 25 kts or 30 kts.
 * I didn't think it hurt to specify. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * No but I think it would make the article more readable in places.Jason Rees (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, I mostly adjusted the deep depressions and removed the wind references there. That work? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * On January 13, the IMD designated the system as a depression. -> remove the a and put Depression BOB 01.
 * Do I have to? It's not mentioned in that source, and I don't feel like finding a source for that exact name :P Plus, I don't name any of the other D/DD's. Is that OK? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The system organized further and developed rainbands. -> Whats the difference between rainbands and convection?
 * Rainbands are convection that spiral around the circulation, like pinwheels on a bike. Well-organized rainbands are signs of good outflow, but outflow is the mechanism, whereas rainbands are the physical feature. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * it was classified by the IMD on September 17 -> As what? An elephant or BOB 02
 * A depression :) ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok everything looks good now and im passing.Jason Rees (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)