Talk:2006 CECAFA Cup/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 19:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Looks like a great article that could easily become a GA. This should be a quick review because the nominator always does a great job with his articles. Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  19:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Pre-Review Notes
I do my review in a style with a "main review" in a table, and 2 side reviews. (a prose and a source) Here is a good example.

Prose Review
Note: If you have changed the sentence that needed to be corrected, press Enter and start off the line with, then use ✅ or ✅ If the change was only partially done use, and or ❌ if the change could not occur. (If you would explain why, I would be greatly appreciated :P) To see code, go to edit source and copy the code.

Overall, I found no prose issues.

Source Review

 * No source issues.
 * Some remarks. The is no use of the word football in the lead, i'd include it once. Much depends on the rsssf link, some more sources for the protest in the semis would be good, also some other ref stating, that zambia won but throphy was awarded to sudan. something like this: http://allafrica.com/stories/200612110168.html the statistics at the bottom don't add up. wins has to equal losses, and goals for should equal goals against. there also is a small visual error in the bracket, first box, tanzania/rwanda ends in the zambia box, either two quarters or the semi should be switched. -Koppapa (talk) 07:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)