Talk:2006 Chicago Bears–Arizona Cardinals game

It was impossible!
"After exchanging punts, Grossman gets intercepted by Darnell Dockett, who then took it 73 yards for a touchdown. However, the Bears challenged the interception, which was eventually reversed." I remember watching that game, and turning it off upon seeing that touchdown. It seemed flatly impossible for the Bears to avoid a loss. When I heard on the morning radio that they'd somehow won, I still couldn't believe it. Before that TD was reversed, their winning chances must have been nil. WHPratt (talk) 03:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Looked like it was possible, because the Bears are who you thought they were! Zappa (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I was hoping that someone knew of an algorithm that predicated winning chances based upon the score differential and the clock: I know that there are some for baseball, based upon score and outs remaining. I figured that -- using the score prior to the reversal as the starting point -- this may have been a comeback of record proportions. WHPratt (talk) 23:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Delete this article
Wikipedia does not need articles for NFL games. It's a slippery slope. Please delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.107.62.165 (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The AFD has been started. The discussion there will determine the outcome. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Chicago Bears–Arizona Cardinals game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101228075004/http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ycn-7464496 to https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ycn-7464496

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)