Talk:2006 English football corruption investigation

"No libel action was taken by any accused".

This is not actually true. Both Bond and Redknapp submitted libel cases against the BBC, but withdrew them before the trial date.

Could there be an argument that the libel proceedings were just for "show"?

"When questioned on the subject, the FA stated that their own investigation was still ongoing, and any charges will probably wait until the governments own investigation into football corruption has concluded."

What 'government' would that be?

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/NewsFromTheFA/Postings/2006/09/FAStatement.htm
 * In 2006 English football corruption investigation on 2011-05-26 01:59:55, 404 Not Found
 * In 2006 English football corruption investigation on 2011-06-13 17:15:32, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

The lead-in I think sufficiently covers the article and needs not be modified any more.DaltonCastle (talk) 04:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 English football corruption investigation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031193801/http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com:80/sport.cfm?id=980622007 to http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/sport.cfm?id=980622007

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)