Talk:2006 Mexican elections

Merge with General Election article
I did not propose the merge, but discussion should go below. -- hello, i'm a member  |  talk to me!  15:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm the one proposing the merge. (Basically the other article is just details about this one that are more current; I propose that this tile be kept for the merged article (to keep in the lines of the other Mexican election articles), but mostly use the other article's content.) In addition I note that the main page is linking to the other one; which probably has a lot to do with why that article is more current. Jon 17:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Mexican general elections, 2006 is more in line with the general style used on Elections by country. I suggest keeping that title and merging this content there. Eluchil404 22:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


 * These shouldn't merge, because this is a directory of all the elections of 2006 with the general election of July 2 being the most important one. --FateClub 07:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * To keep it short, I agree with FateClub's point. -- Run e Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; 17:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * There is the chance that the courts might approve a challenge by Lopez Obrador to begin a ballot by ballot count...I suggest that those interested in doing so could develop this article toward tracking these developments. If the courts approve such action, this story will definitely become a distinct topic...as distinct as the 2000 U.S. presidental election fiasco was.


 * I support a merge, but not yet. Wait a few months first.  When this story becomes less immediate, then it can be merged. Funnyhat 18:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree wtih Funnyhat that this is something that should wait. Once it's no longer a current event, the issue can be revisted.--Saurav 19:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Don't merge them; they're different topics. Read FateClub's comments. Aille 22:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I think they can be left as two seperate articles. Davidpdx 00:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)