Talk:2007 Bernard Matthews H5N1 outbreak/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

As an article on the WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps list, I am reviewing this article. And from the looks of its current state, it doesn't look like GA material. Here's why:
 * There are 3 Citations Needed in the article.
 * Also, maybe some paragraphs should be merged with others, but that's what I think.

If the problems don't get fixed in 7 days, the article will be delisted. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for carrying out this review. I have carried out a revamp of the page:
 * With regard to the matters that concerned you:
 * I have fixed the three missing citations.
 * I have merged several paras to make the article less bitty.
 * Additional improvements:
 * All dates are now in a consistent {UK} format.
 * All references are now at the end of sentences.
 * Improved the writing
 * Typo fixed.
 * Categories revamped.

I hope that this maintains the page's GA status. Indeed, I should like a view as to what further changes might be required to bring it up to FA standard? Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I might tell you how to improve it on your talk page, but for now, I'll keep its GA status. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)