Talk:2007 Emirates Cup/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 05:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Will be reviewing this. MWright96 (talk) 05:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ''([[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|appropriate
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ''([[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|appropriate
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ''([[WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE|appropriate

use]] with suitable captions)'':
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Lead


 * You want to change "football" to "association football" to avoid confusion for American readers


 * Background


 * "Details of the tournament were formally announced weeks later," - How many weeks later exactly?


 * Summary


 * "Referee Alan Kelly turned down Inter's appeals for a penalty," - I understand this but I think it would be better as Inter Milan's for non-football fans
 * "Inter nearly equalised through Maxwell as his effort hit the hot," - I did not understand the word that is bolded, do you mean post?
 * "Wenger tweaked his team's formation after the break from their customary 4–4–2 to 4–4–1–1 ," - the extra space between the second "1" and the comma aren't needed
 * "Near the end of normsl time" - spelling error.


 * References


 * No dead links

Nice work. On hold until points are actioned. MWright96 (talk) 08:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to review have made the corrections you've suggested. Lemonade51 (talk) 09:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Can now pass this review. MWright96 (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)