Talk:2007 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on 2007 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070601005300/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca:80/en/2007/2007scc21/2007scc21.html to http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2007/2007scc21/2007scc21.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070712233951/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca:80/en/2007/2007scc27/2007scc27.html to http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2007/2007scc27/2007scc27.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2007 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070303164256/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2007/2007scc10/2007scc10.html to http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2007/2007scc10/2007scc10.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2007/2007scc21/2007scc21.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2007/2007scc27/2007scc27.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Problems with this article
There are two problems with this article. Largoplazo (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Despite its title, it provides no information about the reasons given by the Supreme Court for its decisions in 2007. Instead, it's a roster of who delivered each reason, joined in it, delivered a concurrence, issued a dissent, etc.
 * 2) The table, being color-coded only, fails accessibility guidelines.