Talk:2007 royal blackmail plot

Publication of libelous material used for blackmail is inappropriate. Fred Talk 16:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Not sure what has happened to the earlier version. The information about "Witness A" is freely available on the net. It is just being protected to protect the royals. Why has an American Wikipedian of all people deleted it?
 * Johnbibby (talk) 20:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Err, it is not an American wikipedia, please correct your erroneous perception, it is an international encyclopedia in English. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * True, but we are governed by Florida law, not English law. PatGallacher (talk) 16:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Speak for yourself, I am governed by neither one nor the other. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Johnbibby did not say "American Wikipedia", he said "an American Wikipedian", meaning an American user of Wikipedia. So who was the royal?  This information seems unexpectedly elusive.  leevclarke (talk) 20:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, I have found a source for this information, which is The Royal Blackmail Plot on Everything2. If the Wikipedia servers are in Florida, are we allowed to publish this information in the article?  It seems very pertinent, and if it's legal then it should be in this article, and in the article on the royal family member in question.  leevclarke (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i0P9lyc8yBYIywP5G8Ol_sVBZ6yQD8TL6ECO0
 * In 2007 royal blackmail plot on 2011-05-26 03:14:08, 410 Gone
 * In 2007 royal blackmail plot on 2011-05-27 15:30:32, 410 Gone
 * In 2007 royal blackmail plot on 2011-06-15 21:43:36, 410 Gone

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)