Talk:2008–09 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

There's so much to be done in this page in order to meet the criteria. -- Crzycheetah 06:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The WP:LEAD is basically non-existent. You should summarize the whole article in the lead section.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Each section needs to have at least one in-line citation to verify the information. Without inline citations, the information can be considered original research.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The latter sections go into unnecessary details about this topic.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Since most of the info is uncited, it's hard to grade neutrality
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * This is a recent topic and can still significantly change.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * There are no images other than the logo.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Needs considerable work