Talk:2008 Australian federal budget

POV tag
The article seems very heavily biased and lopsided. It pretty much wraps up how the opposition would view the government's budget. I refer in particular to the first paragraph. The next two paragraphs are outside criticism of the budget, the last two paras are quite balanced however. POV tag added. Timeshift (talk) 07:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed, the article is very POV-ey and all over the shop. I've moved third party comment to its own section. I was thinking we could also have a section "Opposition and cross-bench response". That way we can deal with the POV problems by representing each major viewpoint (as per WP:NPOV). I don't think neutral text is possible in this article because it would end up being a 'factual' coverage of the budget, which would essentially be parroting the government line. --Surturz (talk) 03:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on 2008 Australian federal budget. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.budget.gov.au
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101020104426/http://australianpolitics.com/issues/budgets/2008/08-05-13_budget-speech.pdf to http://australianpolitics.com/issues/budgets/2008/08-05-13_budget-speech.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)