Talk:2008 FA Cup final/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay taking a look...you know the drill :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 *  ..., their first foray into European football. - I'd probably use a spaced ndash or unspaced mdash here to vary the comma-ing.


 *  The two teams traded poor attempts at goal... - "poor" strikes me as POV. I'd be thnking "inaccurate"..."off-target" or somesuch....


 * Something about the first para of the lead strikes me as a little stilted (the second last sentence) but I can't think of a way of massaging it (so not a deal-breaker as such)

Otherwise on target...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - looks good. only very minor quibbles Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for taking a look, I've amended the first two points and had a crack at rewording the sentence you pointed out in the lead. Let me know what you think. Kosack (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)