Talk:2008 Serbian local elections

Untitled
Today all the necessary laws have been adopted. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Pools
But this edit treats as if G17+ exists no more. The last is DS-G17+ opted together, since they formed a coalition. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe not the best solution, I would also like to see data for G17+. DS and G17+ are not in formal of coalition, and they have not announced that there will be a coalition on elections article is dealing with - they just have similar approach on some actual topics. In this case it would be logical to count together result of previous pools for DS and G17+, but it would not be correct, since some people who took part in the pools might had other oppinion if formal coalition exists. What you think? Jdjerich (talk) 02:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well a formal coalition does exist now. :) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, let's do something to solve this problem. What you say, should we make a new table, which will contain coalitions, as there will for sure be some more in coming days? Jdjerich (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)