Talk:2008 Super League season

Promotion
Perhaps a mention of who was promoted to Super League for 2008 in place of Salford City?--Jeff79 (talk) 03:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Done.

Updates
This article needs some serious updating: I have noticed that there have been some things added but the results section so far is incomplete. I will be able to do some of it but need some help. Thanks. 92.4.147.101 (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * On that note, is the results section really necessary? Each club has their own results section anyway. The table informs the reader just fine, you could simply add a reference inside each cell to the BBC's match report alongside the score. Ginger Warrior (talk) 11:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Ginger Warrior
 * All the results are now updated. We have inconsistency between the two different results formats. While the one giving scorers etc. is undoubtedly more informative, is it really necessary? If so, the remainder of the results should be updated so they are in this format. Regarding the results table, it is undoubtedly a much more concise method of displaying the results, and would be ideal if each team played each other once - home and away - but they don't. Julianhall (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The results could be put on a page similar to this: 2008 NRL season results. This Super League article is too light on actual description at the moment. JoelUK (talk) 22:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Should we follow the National Rugby League season 2008 example fully, and take the results out into its own page (where they can be more detailed), then just have a brief commentary on the results on the Main Article? A lot of work, but something needs to be done. Julianhall (talk) 16:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I have now created 2008 Super League season results so that we can move the list of results away from this main article. I have also put a merge proposal on 2008 Super League playoffs for that article to go into the season results one. I didn't make sense to have season results without including the playoff games and so is a separate playoff article required is the question. This is how the NRL articles are arranged, although we don't have to follow it if a good arguement is made the other way.JoelUK (talk) 22:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Good work! I'd definitely agree to merging 2008 Super League playoffs into 2008 Super League season results. having two independent articles is redundant and any links to 2008 Super League playoffs can be edited to be to an anchor in 2008 Super League season results. Agree to proposed merger. Julianhall (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! As nobody has raised an objection after a week I will go ahead with it. JoelUK (talk) 21:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I've fully revamped the 2008 Super League season results page to make it more similar in format to the NRL's season pages. It includes the play-offs, although the level of detail is less in the new article than the previous (no details of try/goal scorers). I propose deleting the 2008 Play-off's page. Secondly, I also propose renaming this article to Super League XIII results to make it uniform with Super League XIV results (which also needs renaming (small case "r" in 'results') as per WP:NC). GW  ( talk )  16:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Table
Why is the table incomplete? Julianhall (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

'Teams' table
I don't agree with this being depicted as Hull KR's '2nd season'. It just isn't the case and gives a false impression that they're a new club or a club that's new to the competition. I know in some ways the English rugby league championship was re-born with Super League, but the clubs weren't re-born in 1996. This should be changed to better reflect reality unless some solid grounds can be shown that it shouldn't.--Jeff79 (talk) 17:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Super League XIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.superleague.co.uk/page.php?id=346
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225073744/http://www.sportbusiness.com/britsport/166556/engage-super-league-ups-tv-game to http://www.sportbusiness.com/britsport/166556/engage-super-league-ups-tv-game
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091224213456/http://www.sportbusiness.com:80/news/167413/engage-mutual-extend-super-league-sponsorship to http://www.sportbusiness.com/news/167413/engage-mutual-extend-super-league-sponsorship
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090129200447/http://superleague.co.uk:80/statistics_player.php to http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Super League XXIX which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)