Talk:2009 Alabama Crimson Tide football team/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: two found and tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * according various publications. various is a weasel word here, also missing preposition. ✅
 * Statement reworded and "various" removed. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There are a large number of cites to http://www.al.com/blogs/ Blogs are not a [[WP:RS|reliable source. ✅
 * Two dead links refs #166 & #199 ✅
 * Otherwise references check, assume good faith for off-line sources.
 * All of the http://www.al.com/blogs/ have been removed as each one that was used was a secondary source citation. The two dead links have alos been fixed. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough coverage of the subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Captioned and tagged.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On Hold for seven days for issues above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, that does the trick. I am happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time for the review! I believe I have made all of the requested changes, but please feel free to let me know if anything else needs to be done. Thanks again! Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * On Hold for seven days for issues above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, that does the trick. I am happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time for the review! I believe I have made all of the requested changes, but please feel free to let me know if anything else needs to be done. Thanks again! Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time for the review! I believe I have made all of the requested changes, but please feel free to let me know if anything else needs to be done. Thanks again! Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)