Talk:2009 Astana season/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Two found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: Repaired 13 and tagged four dead links. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The team's manager up through the Tour de France is Johan Bruyneel. Surely this should be "was"?
 * The team's biggest success in 2009 is Contador's overall victory in the Tour de France Again "was"
 * Elsewhere, their main successes in 2009 have been in small stage races, "were" not have been. Please check your tenses throughout.  This is all definite past now.
 * Severo got these.
 * Astana was one of 22 teams to participate to the Giro d'Italia. ?
 * I don't see the problem, but I revised it anyway.
 * The problem was the phrase "to participate to the Giro d'Italia"
 * The team was nicknamed "Team Fade" in description of their new jerseys.  Poor grammar, please rephrase.
 * Not notable, removed.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Four dead links as noted above, all other references check out.
 * There were way more than four. It's been addressed.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Fine
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Fine
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Fine
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Fine, captioned and licensed.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for issues noted above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine, thanks for fixing the issues. I am happy to list this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll get to this today. Green-eyed girl ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 10:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Looks like it should be good to go now? Green-eyed girl ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 20:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)