Talk:2009 swine flu pandemic by country summary

Problem with North Korea ref?
On my system the references terminate after the yahoo mail regarding North Korea. Does anybody know, what problem we have here? is resolved FHessel (talk) 10:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Approaching 2010 and other few issues
Since we are approaching 2010, there will be calls to rename the table 2009-2010 flu pandemic or something similar along these lines. Anyone care to comment on a name change? Also the loading times for editing a table of this size is taking longer. Its more probably more to do with the extra information, and countries being added. The bulk of the table has been taken up by the Indicators column which has separate colour codings for each country. FHessel did a great job adding them in the middle of the year and I would like to have his comments whether we should relocate the Indicators and put them into another table. At least this will halve the loading times for editing the table. Another thing is that we are getting some many numbers being bandied around that we might have missed differentiating A/H1N1 flu from other types of influenza. This was the case a month or so back with Ukraine, and I have a feeling that the Japan numbers with a few numbers are not so accurate. But since the situation is so fluid, with the increasing number of cases and deaths we tend to ignore this. Roman888 (talk) 15:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Name change: Sure, 2009-2010 flu pandemic seems adequate.


 * Indicators column: regarding the indicators I am ambivalent. On the one hand I still regard them as being important. On the other hand it is imperative to updated them, and there seems to be nobody except me, who would do this job. But - I do not have the time for updating them. So, do whatever you think is appropriate.
 * FHessel (talk) 16:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * What about taking countries with no deaths out of the table? This would shorten it considerably.--Roentgenium111 (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * It would certainly shorten it, but I don't see any value in doing so. The numbers are already hidden by default, so the gain to the end user would be minimal.  Additionally, there are surely many people interested in said #s and they are part of the total at the top. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Albania?
There are 12 H1N1 victims in Albania, I know it cause I live in Tirana.

This is the confirmation from the Albanian health ministry: http://www.moh.gov.al/Situata.php?Lajmi=5 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.69.162 (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Second wave in India and Bolivia (and Australia?): Shouldn't we start a new table?
In my opinion it would be good to close the 2009/2010 table and start a new one. That would facilitate the understanding of what is currently going on. What do you think? Have a look at the google news survey: http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=H1N1+wave
 * FHessel (talk) 23:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)


 * What information would be put into this new table? CaninePitDog (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It could be a good idea, however what date would be considered for the next wave ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.203.187.20 (talk) 09:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

here http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=64283 http://www.recombinomics.com/News/07301001/H1N1_India_CFR.html manchurian candidate 15:50, 8 August 2010 (UTC)