Talk:2010 Brazilian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll take this one. Comments to follow soon. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): {{GAList/check|}y}
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Lead

 * "Jenson Button, Hamilton's teammate, was mathematically eliminated from retaining the championship" Suggest making it more clear that Button was the defending champion

Background

 * "with 231 points; ahead of Red Bull's Mark Webber" think a comma is more appropriate here, or perhaps even nothing at all

Practice

 * No major issues that I can see.

Post-qualifying

 * "Kovalainen 20th and Di Grassi 21st" small d in "di Grassi."

Race

 * ALT text for images might be good if you have FAC aspirations, but not a requirement here by any means.
 * "Schumacher fell to tenth by driving onto the grass" was this a driver's error or was he forced onto the grass?
 * "the Grand Prix's sole safety car deployment:" I'd change this to a simple period but feel free to ignore this one if you like it as is.

Post-race

 * Just a note, I've boldly tweaked the captions to ensure the parentheses are non-italics, feel free to tweak further


 * Refs, images look good, no dab or external link issues.

Really just some minor prose stuff here. Should be simple fixes. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Have addressed all of the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Pass. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)