Talk:2010 Crown Royal Presents the Heath Calhoun 400/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Derild  49  21  ☼  01:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC) Hello, this is my first GA review so please remind me if I do anything wrong. Thanks!
 * Ok, looking at the page now, it passes the quick-fail criteria and I will now conduct a full review. Derild  49  21  ☼  01:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

In depth review

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Only saw a typo NSD fixed


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Free of OR, still checking rest
 * Conditions were clear with a high of 88 °F (31 °C), making the track potentially slippery.[14] Where in ref 14 does it say the track would become potentially slippery. Minor issue, but I don't get the concept and I also couldn't find it in the reference. Besides this it's fine.
 * since it isn't stated by the source. ~ N S D    (✉ • ✐) 13:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, according to this, ref 2 is dead. Any alternative?
 * Didn't show up now. So I guess it was fixed. -- Nascar 1996   Contributions /  Guestbook  13:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That's because I replaced it. ~ N S D    (✉ • ✐) 13:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, rest of the references look good so as soon as the lead is done I guess I can pass this. (A bit quick but I guess that's what happens with a well written article beforehand ;)) Derild  49  21  ☼  13:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Looking at some of your other GA's this article is fine.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No problem, free of POV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No problem, editors working together fine.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All are free use and there are enough in the article with captions
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Ok, after going through and having fixed up the minor issues I saw this article is now a GA! Derild  49  21  ☼  13:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Miscellaneous

 * The lead is a bit on the short side. Maybe add in a paragraph on the background section and practice. Derild  49  21  ☼  13:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Compared to the other articles, such as 2010 Toyota/Save Mart 350, I will add a small race summary to the lead.-- Nascar 1996   Contributions /  Guestbook  13:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅  Nascar 1996   Contributions /  Guestbook  13:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)