Talk:2010 Jacksonville Jaguars season

Teal "Dividers"
These teal "dividers" are absolutely stupid, because they appear to section the article into weeks, but instead, divide each week in half. They are so loud (yet, admittedly, attractive) that they dominate the summary section and give a false impression of when each week's summary begins and ends. Gotta go. 98.82.23.53 (talk) 21:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I checked. Nobody else appears to have anything else like that (though the Colts have something remotely similar but not at all confusing.  So it's gone.  Don't put back the teal bars without justifying yourself here. 98.82.23.53 (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I adapted them from the dividers used in the Dallas Cowboys article. Admittedly they are easier on the eyes when using the Dallas Blue/Grey color scheme. I'm all for getting a unified look across the articles, so either remove them there or restore them here. For the time being I restored them to the grey color they used to have. Also, they're not just dividers, they contain scoring and statistics information. DragonFury (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * PS. I really like the way the summaries look in the Colts article. Those manage to keep the attractiveness of the team colors while not separating the infobox from the summary. DragonFury (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow, I totally missed the fact that they were expandable. The light Dallas color is better, but it still looks like it's dividing one part of the week from the other, making the top of one week look like it belongs to the previous week.
 * Uniformity is desirable, but no one can impose upon the entire project their vision. What we need to do first is establish the look we like here at Jaguars, then gently test the waters in the other season articles.  As much as I hate Peyton and Polian, I have to admit the Colts fans who did up their look got it right.  Why don't you copy that, with Jaguar colors? 98.82.23.53 (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Quick feedback required, Which is better? DragonFury (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Option 1:

Option 2:


 * I like option 1. I definitely like the collapsable option, though. It looks a lot more cluttered now. I think Template:Americanfootballbox has an option for colors. ~ Richmond 96   t  •  c   23:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Here's what I like: ~ Richmond 96   t  •  c   23:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I definitely don't like Richmond's version, for reasons stated above. I prefer Option 1. 98.82.23.53 (talk) 17:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Then, could "Option 1" possibly be collapsable? ~ Richmond 96   t  •  c   23:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * P. S. My overall favorite look is the way it was before. (Grey dividers - See 2009 Jacksonville Jaguars season) ~ Richmond 96   t  •  c   23:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)