Talk:2010 Samsung Mobile 500/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Xtzou ( Talk ) 18:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have reviewed this article, copy edited it and added some wikilinks. Please feel free to edit any mistakes I may have made. This is a short article, but it clearly tells the story of the race and complies with the GA criteria.

 GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Congratulations! Xtzou ( Talk ) 18:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality: Concise writing
 * B. MoS compliance: Complies with the basic MoS
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources: Sources are reliable
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced where needed
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects: Broad in scope
 * B. Focused: } Remains focused on topic
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!
 * Pass or Fail: Pass!