Talk:2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull

Hacked?
http://i.imgur.com/7ULQc0w.png

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on 2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120707091615/http://www.earthice.hi.is/page/IES-EY-CEMCOM to http://www.earthice.hi.is/page/IES-EY-CEMCOM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2010/apr/03/iceland-erupting-volcano-hyjafjallajoekull
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090926041646/http://perso.club-internet.fr/acatte/Iceland_Laki_in_english.htm to http://perso.club-internet.fr/acatte/Iceland_Laki_in_english.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Section on Short- and long-term weather and environmental effects
The paragraph on the relation to the solar cycle (starting 'While it is suspected') is highly speculative. The claims made are not scientifically accepted. There is no evidence that Icelandic eruptions are related to the sun (the only paper discussing any effect is on a few Japanese eruptions and it does not reach the 3-sigma level required for a detection) and the sentence beginning 'Most consider' presents opinion rather than accepted fact. I would recommend deleting this paragraph.ABZebra (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Agricultural improvements and positives
Shortly after the volcano had become dormant, the fresh layer of soil resting above the previous earth was extremely fertile and allowed Iceland's agricultural industry to thrive. However, it took approximately 6 months before farming could resume due to a significant lack of infrastructure due to the extensive damage the eruption caused. On Icelandic farmer who had to evacuate his farm near Eyjafjallajökull said 'With this soil, I could become a multi-millionaire, but with these remaining resources, I can scarcely dig a hole.' Despite this, Iceland has rebuilt its economy and infrastructure at a pace which UK PM Gordon Brown considered 'excruciatingly fast', putting Iceland's farming produce back on the market across Europe and North America. To this date (2022) Iceland agricultural industry has rocketed up in size and popularity by 29% since the natural disaster that occurred in 2010. 88.202.152.248 (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)