Talk:2010s in LGBT rights

Two main problems: linking and detail
On the linking issue: I was copy editing the article and removed a lot of duplicate wikilinks. I'm fairly new to editing on Wikipedia so I'm not sure exactly how to fix the issue, but there is a lot of inconsistency in what words/phrases are made into links and where those links go. e.g.: - Country names sometimes link to the country, sometimes to an article on the history of same-sex marriage rights in that country. - The parliament/court/governing body of a country is sometimes linked to an article on that body, sometimes not. On the detail issue: Some items in the list contain too much information about an event. e.g.: - Exact numbers of votes on decisions for bills or court cases are sometimes included, is this necessary? - Exact reasoning is sometimes included for decisions made and this leads to run-on sentences.

--Wispiee (talk) 01:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * It's me again. I did some clicking around and research about how the process for editing an article and raising concerns works so I added a notice about the overlinking issue. I decided to go ahead and do it before receiving a response here for two main reasons.
 * First, it was a major readability issue as I was editing. I think this means it clearly qualifies as overlinking, even by the standards in Template:Overlinked. Second, this article doesn't have a lot of attention. I doubt anything will come of either of these talk posts in a reasonable amount of time and this will resolve the (rather extensive) issue a lot faster. Wispiee (talk) 02:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)