Talk:2011 Football League Two play-off final/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 11:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ✅ tag to state when something is addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Lede

 * The top three teams of the 2010–11 Football League Two season, - maybe "the highest placed three teams in the 2010-11 Football League Two table" or similar. I'd like to have the specifics of how this is calculated.
 * The "top three" wording is used on around 100 such articles so there's no real need to change it as it's not actually incorrect. And specifics of how league tables works is not for this specific article, it's clear that the top three have more points.  The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 15:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 2011–12 season in the Championship - League One, no? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 15:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

General

 * I think, because you've got written a lot of these, you've misplaced a few leagues. Such as " finished the regular 2010–11 season in sixth place in Football League One, the fourth", when it was League Two. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed that. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 15:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * overseeing the most successful period of the club's history.[10 - I feel this is implied from the previous sentence. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Tried to preserve some of another editor's text but gone now. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 15:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The referee for the match was Darren Deadman - could probably be integrated into the match summary. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 15:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * In the statistics section, is it worth using something to show at a distance which club had the better statistics? Whether that be boldening, or † Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I've never seen that done in other reliable sources, and I'm not sure it's entirely suitable. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 15:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you may have broken a ref in there, but I'm not sure where the statistics actually are within that source? Any ideas? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean. The BBC website is a bit "odd" around this time, I've found a slightly different version of the same page which has the stats and replaced the reference throughout.  It looks a bit "off" but it's still the same BBC match report, just with stats at the bottom.  Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 07:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Review meta comments

 * I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 11:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Not much to do, just a bit of cleanup. Will place on hold so you can check the info, but should be easy enough to solve. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * cheers, I've responded to and/or addressed your comments. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 15:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)