Talk:2011 LSU vs. Alabama football game/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 03:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality: (Quality is very good.)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: (Article meets with this section of the review.)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources: (All sources/references are reliable.)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every statement has a reference/source.)
 * C. No original research: (No original research was found.)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects: (Article covers all the major aspects of the game. Talks about the rivalry, team info and match/game info.)
 * B. Focused: (All the info in the article is all related to the topic.)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems stable.)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All images appear to be licensed properly.)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (All images are related to the article and a good amount of photos are also provided.)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Very good and well written article. Really enjoyed reading and reviewing it...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time for the review! It was much appreciated! Patriarca12 (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems stable.)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All images appear to be licensed properly.)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (All images are related to the article and a good amount of photos are also provided.)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Very good and well written article. Really enjoyed reading and reviewing it...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time for the review! It was much appreciated! Patriarca12 (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Very good and well written article. Really enjoyed reading and reviewing it...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time for the review! It was much appreciated! Patriarca12 (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)