Talk:2011 NATO attack in Pakistan/Archives/2012/May

Kiyani's visit to China
The text doesn't mention Chinese reaction rather only Kiyani's comment. Is there a statement from China to be added to that or is it just that? In its current form it might be more suitable to the government's reaction section. -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The news reports I read about this mention that the Chinese leadership personally invited Kayani (Kayani’s visit, at the invitation of the Chinese leadership, is the first in recent years...) and the invitation came just when relations with the US are in a fallout, that's why I thought it may fit in the official Chinese reaction section. Although I also partly included that info in that particular section to add some WP:Weight to China's response, which was only two lines long. Either way, it doesn't really bother me, so feel free to move the content if it's more appropriate for the government section. Mar4d (talk) 17:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, right... it was an invitation. I guess I missed that. Well it's fine there then. Enough for the weight, thanks for clarifying. -- lTopGunl (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)