Talk:2011 New Zealand Labour Party leadership election/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 04:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

If there are no objections, I'll take this review. I'll note at the outset I've had no role in editing or creating this article. I welcome other editors at any stage to contribute to this review. I will spend a day familiarising myself with the article and then provide an assessment. Kind regards, LT910001 (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for waiting. In conducting this review, I will:
 * Provide an assessment using WP:GARC
 * If this article does not meet the criteria, explain what areas need improvement.
 * Provide possible solutions that may (or may not) be used to fix these.

Commentary
Firstly, I'd like to apologise to you for having to wait almost three months to get a GA review. I hope that you're still present on Wikipedia and that next review is conducted in a briefer timespan. With regard to the article, some comments are below:--LT910001 (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I find it to be very well-sourced and well-written.
 * I feel that the article could mention slightly more the issues that were contested, as the only reference I could find related to the candidate presenting a 'fresh face'.
 * I don't feel that it's necessary to mention the 2013 issue in the lede, or at all in the article, as I feel resigning in 2013 is a separate issue not related to the 2011 campaign.
 * I have completed a check for close-paraphrasing (not present) and sources (present and accurately reflected in-text).
 * There do not appear to be any other issues that would prevent nomination.
 * Thank you for the review, and sorry for taking so long to respond. I have removed details about the 2013 election and added a see also link. I searched and searched for policy/issues discussed, and unfortunately I only managed to find one interview transcript. Adabow (talk) 04:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Conclusion
Thanks for your edits. I feel this article meets the GA criteria, is readable, well-sourced, and interesting to read (an additional benefit!). I have made all the relevant changes and wish you well in your wiki-travels. Well done! --LT910001 (talk) 06:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)