Talk:2011 Philadelphia, Mississippi tornado/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 09:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria
: With several grammatical tweaks, I believe the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, along with general structure and layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses a good number of reliable publications. No signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to cover all encyclopedically relevant information for which reliable sourcing could be obtained. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. With a few tonal word adjustments made, I believe the article now satisfies neutrality criteria. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC) . The article has not been subject to any edit warring or similarly disruptive editing behaviours since its recent creation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 11:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC) : All four images used in the article are relevant to the topic, and all are public domain, so there is no risk of fair use violation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)


 * Been a month since you started this, giving a courtesy ping in case you simply forgot ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 19:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I apologize for the long wait. I believe, upon reading the article over and making the adjustments noted above, that it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 11:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)