Talk:2011 Tirreno–Adriatico/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose good, organization good. I made a few minor copy-edits. Complies sufficiently with key MoS elements. I note US English spelling, you might wish to put Template:American English on the talk page.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References appear RS, support the cited statements, no evidence of OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficient detail without unnecessary trivia.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Captioned and licensed OK
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)