Talk:2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: - Adam37   Talk  15:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * This article has only one completely forgiveable shortcoming in my view which is most likely seen under featured articles, ie currently popular copyedit standard leads, having regard to all the good article criteria and 7 links are now ideally in need of precise coding tlc as now redirects (so still work but careful future-proofers will like to fix).
 * I have swapped out three refs. A fourth one seemed to be bad earlier, but it is not appearing in the listing from this tool.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 10:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

None of the articles linked to (links) need disambiguation in their coding.

Reviewer: Adam37 (talk · contribs) 15:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Now that's done perhaps we could consider removing the lead's stadium capacity, which, while not quite fixed, seems like digression here, as opposed to in a team article, though by encyclopedic convention not necessarily in an "infobox" which is a Mecca for statisticians... and dare I say it should this convention-only view not prevail (philosophically, what in encyclopedias cannot be improved by numbers?) the digression into this outstandingly ample capacity is Peacock which is elsewhere not seen even for such a top flight team. The records really do however each stand out in US basketball for the season and make a great read for anyone aspiring in the whole sport. -  Adam37   Talk  20:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Done, but not really sure why.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)