Talk:2012 Brazilian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 20:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Minor nitpick, but numbers between one and twelve need to be spelled out (except turn numbers).
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The only problem with the article is that Wikiproject Brazil rates it as a stub. Good Article Criteria prohibits any passing of articles that have been rated as a stub.-- Nascar   king  20:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The only problem with the article is that Wikiproject Brazil rates it as a stub. Good Article Criteria prohibits any passing of articles that have been rated as a stub.-- Nascar   king  20:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The only problem with the article is that Wikiproject Brazil rates it as a stub. Good Article Criteria prohibits any passing of articles that have been rated as a stub.-- Nascar   king  20:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your review! :) I don't believe that anyone from the Brazil Project ever took a look at this article. I also doubt they are even aware that the Brazilian Grand Prix is in their field of activity, I guess someone just put the box there... I could have changed their rating of the article, but it did not seem to be my place, since I am only active in the F1 project. But I guess it is quite clear that this article is not a stub, so we might as well change it. Cheers! Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Very well then. I hereby give 2012 Brazilian Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.-- Nascar   king  20:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you!! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)