Talk:2012 Moldova security zone incident

Names
Veaceslav Kojuhari was a Romanian transliteration of Russian name. I replaced it with English. (The corresponding correct Romanian surname would be Cojocaru.) Logofat de Chichirez (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It appears to be a Ukrainian name, actually. The Russian "analogue" would probably be "Kozhevnikov" or something like that. I'm not sure mentioning the name is even necessary, as most cited sources refer to him in a rather "just some (Russian) guy" manner. --illythr (talk) 01:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Death of Vadim Pisari
The pivotal point of the incident is the death of Vadim Pisari isn't it?. It's not clear why some information concerning Vadim Pisari were removed? It's not clear why his name was completely removed from the introduction to the article?

Death of Vadim Pisari is a notable case concerning the human rights in Moldova. Human rights groups accused that a 18-year-old civilian, Vadim Pisari, was killed on 1 January 2012 after being shot in the back by an army officer. Human rights organizations request a transparent investigation, with international involvement, into the circumstances and causes that led to the death of Vadim Pisari. The U.S. Representative to the OSCE, Ian C. Kelly called on both Russian and Moldovan authorities to conduct a thorough investigation. "The Moldovan leadership made it clear that there are no justifications for human losses." "Nothing justifies the death of a person," Moldova Prime Minister Vlad Filat said. 31 members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe signed a declaration stating that "the preliminary investigation proves the Russian peacekeeper had no reason to open fire on the vehicle."

Death of Vadim Pisari is a notable case concerning the international relations. According to The New York Times, his death has risen the tension with Russia and has revived a decades-old debate over security in Moldova.

The pivotal point of the incident is the death of Vadim Pisari isn't it?. But there are not enough information about the victim. It's not clear why some of them were removed? It's not clear why his name, Vadim Pisari, was completely removed from the introduction to the article? Isn't it too much an article about the death of Vadim Pisari and another about the incident? Two articles about the same thing? Iunanista (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No, the pivotal point is the incident that resulted in the death of a civilian by a Russian peacekeeper. According to Wikipedia rules, the individual participants are not notable because of this one event: See WP:BLP1E. Also note how the New York Times article is named: There's no name in the headline, nor in the intro. --illythr (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)