Talk:2012 Summer Paralympics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article. On the face of it, it will need some work in order to pass. Please allow a day or two for me to post comments. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * See below
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * See below
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Controversies
 * A little embarrassed that a controversy that we started gets so much. You should also add the one about the medal that was taken away after the handicap was re-calculated.
 * ✅, assuming you mean Mariia Pomazan - EronTalk 19:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * References
 * FN 1 has a raw URL
 * FN 2 is broken
 * FN 11 is broken
 * FN 19 is broken
 * FN 21 is broken
 * FN 52 has a raw URL (Site also appears to be virus infected)
 * FN 57 publisher? access date?
 * FN 58 publisher? access date?
 * FN 65 has a raw URL
 * FN 66 is broken
 * FN 92 is broken
 * FN 93 is broken
 * ✅All the above references have been reviewed and fixed - EronTalk 20:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * External links
 * First one is broken
 * ✅ - EronTalk 18:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC) ( A few fixes is all we need. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Three citation needed tags that need fixing, and we'll be good. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ - EronTalk 19:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Passing article. Well done. I note in passing that Sir Phillip Craven's comments about media coverage (in the controversies section) were in response to questions at a press conference from Wikipedia reporters. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)