Talk:2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The following needs to be taken care of:
 * Prologue: The first paragraph needs sources, both for the course and the statement of the expected times.
 * Stage 6: were as one again, not long later sounds really weird, maybe you can find a better wording?
 * The references to the Team Sky website are dead, please find a replacement or archived links here.

That's about it. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * All taken care of, hopefully. Craig  (talk)  22:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good, it's a pass! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)