Talk:2013 24 Hours of Le Mans/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Matt294069 (talk · contribs) 08:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

So I will be happy to review this article as on first inspections it's look like it will be suitable for the good article. Of course you don't quite know if that is the case.

Lead

 * ...by the No. 42 Greaves Motorsport Zytek Z11SN driven by... - Is their meant to be a comma between the two wiki-linked pages here.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ...championship leaders going into the race Lotterer, Fässler and Tréluyer... - I think their is meant to be a comma between race and Lotterer.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Background

 * This is fine, no problems with this

Balance of Performance changes

 * What is with all of these l, imp gal and US gal mean.
 * See Template:Convert MWright96 (talk)

Entries

 * ...between the LMP1, and LMP2... - Remove the "and" before LMP2.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I know this isn't really a part of it, but JMW Motorsport is red-linked so you could either create a article or remove the wiki links for it. This is the same with most of the other red-link pages that is in this article.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Testing and practice

 * The LMGTE Pro class lead constantly changed with... - Was it between those two cars that followed through in this sentence or was their more cars involved in the changing of the lead.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 16:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Just a thought, is their any other related sources that suited for this practice session instead of using the same reference five times. Of course you don't have to follow it up as their is no issues with this.

Qualifying

 * ...final seconds of third qualifying... - We already know that this is the third session because of it being earlier in the paragraph.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 16:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ...making the top three in LMP2 to be represented by three manufacturers... - I know what I am thinking but this could be better worded in a way so that it slightly flow better.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 16:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Warm-up

 * The first half of this paragraph you haven't really been adding the references for the different classes.
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 16:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Several drivers went off the track during the session which had three crashes. - Says several drivers but looking on their seems to be only three drivers that was mention in this.
 * Reworded the sentence. MWright96 (talk) 16:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Start

 * ...for second at the second Mulsanne chicane... - Missing the word place after second.
 * ...Audi duo of McNish of di Grassi within half... - Change of to and here.
 * ...in the first three overall... - Change first to top.

Night
Seems fine here

Morning to early afternoon

 * ...lowered it by six seconds by... - Change by to to.

Finish
Seems fine here

Post-race
No issues here.

Standings after the race

 * No issues

Final comments
So just final touch ups and I think this is good enough to go for a good article. HawkAussie (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for reviewing the article. All of the points raised above have been addressed. MWright96 (talk) 06:19, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Good job as that is another one to add to the Good Article bank. HawkAussie (talk) 08:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)