Talk:2013 Malian parliamentary election

Parliamentary electoral system
If I can rely on the electoral law of 2006 on the website of the UN (article 157), the parliamentary electoral system is two round majority; there can be districts with more than one seat, in which case voters can only choose among closed lists (article 89) and the list winning a majority of votes gets all the seats. --Bancki (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

This is confirmed by the Inter-Parliamentary Union and by IFES Election Guide, but according to IFES they have only single member districts.--Bancki (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

A more recent version of the electoral law (consolidated with amendments of 2011) on the website of the Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA) confirms two round majority, with the possibility of multi-member districts (in that case with closed list majority).--Bancki (talk) 20:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Links
>> Low turnout mars Mali's parliamentary vote(Lihaas (talk) 10:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)).

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malian parliamentary election, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202225345/http://www.iri.org/news-events-press-center/news/largely-peaceful-process-defines-presidential-election-day-mali to http://www.iri.org/news-events-press-center/news/largely-peaceful-process-defines-presidential-election-day-mali

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

National results
I didn't find any valid source indicating votes for Rally for Mali, Union for the Republic and Democracy and Alliance for Democracy in Mali. The only possibile summary is the following: --151 cp (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ADEMA: 112,248
 * ADEMA-ADP-Maliba: 11,144
 * ADEMA-ASMA-CFP: 22,750
 * ADEMA-CNID: 11,640
 * ADEMA-CNID-RJP: 10,237
 * ADEMA-CNID-RPDM: 28,176
 * ADEMA-CODEM-FARE: 5,963
 * ADEMA-CODEM-MIRIA: 33,915
 * ADEMA-CODEM-RPM: 63,168
 * ADEMA-MPR-URD: 18,088
 * ADEMA-PARENA: 31,808
 * ADEMA-RPM: 47,598
 * ADEMA-URD: 22,584
 * ADEMA-URD-PRVM-PDES-PARENA: 37,325
 * ADP-Maliba: 11,293
 * ADP-Maliba-CODEM: 7,501
 * ADP-Maliba-MPR: 1,063
 * AMPC-ADP-Maliba: 1,493
 * APR: 1,714
 * APR-CNID: 2,353
 * APR-UNPR: 1,696
 * ASMA: 12,497
 * ASMA-CFP: 28,412
 * ASMA-CFP-MPR: 7,448
 * ASMA-CFP-UDD: 3,914
 * ASMA-CFP-URD-CODEM: 15,103
 * ASMA-URD-CODEM: 4,941
 * CDS-URD-FARE: 24,037
 * CNID: 25,974
 * CNID-CODEM-RPDM: 12,343
 * CNID-SADI: 5,108
 * CNID-UDA-YELEMA-RPDM-CDS-FARE: 5,862
 * CNID-UDD: 1,322
 * CNID-URD: 9,629
 * CODEM: 24,786
 * CODEM-CNID: 9,815
 * CODEM-FARE-RPDM: 4,155
 * CODEM-PACP-UMP-RDP: 3,501
 * CODEM-RDPM: 2,198
 * CODEM-RDS: 1,267
 * CODEM-RPMD-SADI: 4,412
 * CODEM-UDM-MODEC: 2,735
 * FAMA-RPDM: 3,688
 * FARE: 19,116
 * FARE-UM-RDA: 1,852
 * FARE-YELEMA: 3,973
 * Independent: 37,255
 * MIRIA: 4,040
 * MODEC: 34,807
 * MODEC-SADI: 6,904
 * MPR: 1,421
 * MPR-CODEM: 10,645
 * MPR-PARENA: 4,841
 * MPR-PARENA-MIRIA: 1,775
 * MPR-SADI: 3,934
 * MPR-URD-ADEMA: 17,510
 * MPR-YELEMA: 11,944
 * Others: 158,599
 * PARENA: 19521
 * PARENA): 933
 * PARENA-ADP-Maliba: 7,021
 * PARENA-RPC: 7,745
 * PCR-MPR: 4,529
 * PCR-UMRDA-PDES: 5,514
 * PDES: 10,540
 * PDES-ADEMA: 3,929
 * PDES-CNID: 5,019
 * PDES-PARENA: 1,150
 * PDES-URD-UMRDA: 26,053
 * PDES-URP: 4,875
 * PRVM: 17,715
 * PSP-UMRDA: 17,638
 * RDPM-SADI: 12,942
 * RDP-PARENA: 3,781
 * RPDM: 2,043
 * RPDM-ADP-Maliba: 28,433
 * RPDM-CNID-PSDA: 2,214
 * RPDM-PARENA: 1,470
 * RPDM-PCR: 2,563
 * RPDM-PDES: 3,517
 * RPM: 170,060
 * RPM-ADEMA: 99,626
 * RPM-ADP-Maliba: 10,320
 * RPM-APR-ADEMA: 24,848
 * RPM-ASMA: 2,893
 * RPM-CODEM: 12,467
 * RPM-CODEM-UDD: 29,363
 * RPM-FARE: 38,945
 * RPM-MIRIA-FARE: 43,069
 * RPM-MPR-ADP-Maliba: 11,411
 * RPM-MPR-FARE: 22,073
 * RPM-UDD: 12,795
 * RPM-UM-RDA-SADI: 27,981
 * RPM-URD: 15,586
 * RPM-URD-FARE-ADEMA: 43,482
 * SADI: 17,725
 * SADI-ADEMA-URD-MPR: 41,876
 * SADI-CNID: 1,488
 * SADI-PRVM: 6,968
 * SADI-RPDM: 1,169
 * SADI-YELEMA: 1,993
 * UDA-URD: 3,680
 * UDD: 21,419
 * UDD-ASMA-CFP-PDES: 15,858
 * UDD-CODEM: 2,013
 * UDD-MPR-SADI-RPDM: 5,452
 * UDD-PARENA: 6,009
 * UDD-PSP: 8,653
 * UDD-RTD: 1,010
 * UDD-YELEMA-SADI: 5,431
 * UFDP-PRVM-CODEM: 11,630
 * UMAM-APR: 2,228
 * UMAM-PARENA-ASMA: 2,993
 * UMPC-ADP-Maliba: 4,706
 * UMPC-CNID: 2,657
 * UMRDA: 5,622
 * UM-RDA: 2,339
 * UMRDA FASO: 9,844
 * UMRDA-RPDM-UMP: 3,229
 * UMRDA-RPM: 12,436
 * UM-RDA-RPM: 20,594
 * UPPR-RAMAT-MIRIA-ASMA-CFP: 4,877
 * URD: 181,283
 * URD-ASMA-CODEM-MPR: 26,013
 * URD-CODEM: 7,409
 * URD-CODEM-MPR: 16,023
 * URD-MPR: 7,697
 * URD-MPR-PARENA: 15,941
 * URD-MPR-YELEMA: 7,359
 * URD-PDES: 31,369
 * URD-PDES-CODEM-MPR-PIDS: 18,093
 * URD-PIDS: 6,356
 * URD-SADI: 7,215
 * URD-UDD: 6,971
 * URD-YELEMA-CNID: 18,257
 * YELEMA: 36,966
 * YELEMA-ADEMA: 5,707
 * YELEMA-ASMA-CFP: 5,966
 * YELEMA-CNID-PCR: 3,792
 * YELEMA-CODEM: 2122
 * YELEMA-FARE: 1,771
 * YELEMA-RTD-ADP-Maliba: 10,692
 * YELEMA-UDM-UDA: 1,999
 * YELEMA-URP-FARE: 1,990
 * Valid votes:: 2,414,474
 * The figures in the table are from here, which is listed as one of the sources in the table. This site would appear to have full results – is this where you got the figures above? I assume they are first round votes? Number   5  7  16:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, they are the results of the first round according with abamako.com. I think the criterion used by Adam Carr is absurd: why should we consider the votes obtained by the coalition RPM-ADEMA (and other lists), or RPM-URD (and other lists), as votes obtained by only RPM, or consider votes obtained by URD-ADEMA as votes obtained by only URD, so that we subtract to ADEMA both votes obtained by this list in coalition with RPM and those obtained with URD, falsifying the results significantly? In any case, even if we wanted to use that criterion, RPM obtained 708,715 votes (and not 708,716). --151 cp (talk) 13:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it's simpler to keep the lists exactly as they are listed in the results, although this would make the seat totals for each party a bit harder to understand. Number   5  7  22:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It could be simpler, but it's simplistic: we should indicate real results and not results which are the consequence of our personal re-elaboration. We can indicate only the number of seats... --151 cp (talk) 14:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I perhaps worded that badly. The results should be as you've presented them above, i.e. the actual results for the different list combinations. What I meant about the seats was that it wouldn't be entirely clear from the table how many seats each individual party has, unless we did a separate seats-only summary table underneath. Number   5  7  19:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, I understood now. Seats for each list or group of list is available here. The summary of seats is the follow (even if the total is 148, and not 147: so I should verify...): --151 cp (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ADEMA: 1
 * ADEMA-ADP: 3
 * ADEMA-ASMA-CFP: 3
 * ADEMA-CNID-FYT: 2
 * ADEMA-CODEM-RPM: 7
 * ADEMA-RPM: 2
 * ADEMA-URD: 2
 * ADEMA-URD-PRVM-PDES-PARENA: 5
 * ASMA-CFP: 3
 * ASMA-CFP-URD-CODEM: 3
 * CDS-URD-FARE: 4
 * CNID-URD: 2
 * CODEM-CNID: 2
 * INDEPENDENT: 4
 * PARENA: 2
 * RPDM-ADP: 3
 * RPM: 23
 * RPM-ADEMA: 12
 * RPM-ADP: 3
 * RPM-APR-ADEMA: 3
 * RPM-CODEM: 3
 * RPM-FARE: 3
 * RPM-MIRIA-FARE: 10
 * RPM-MPR-ADP: 3
 * RPM-MPR-FARE: 7
 * RPM-UDD: 3
 * RPM-URD: 2
 * RPM-URD-FARE-ADEMA: 5
 * SADI: 2
 * SADI-ADEMA-URD-MPR: 6
 * UMRDA FASO-JIGI-RPM: 2
 * URD: 6
 * URD-PDES: 4
 * URD-YELEMA-CNID: 3