Talk:2013 Pittsburgh mayoral election/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) *I am having trouble understanding whether there is a pattern in the capitalisation of the 'm' in mayor (eg "both had run for mayor in prior elections" and "stated that he would run for Mayor"). See MOS:JOBTITLES for some guidance on this.
 * 2) *When referring to people you have recently mentioned, you can drop their first name and just use their last name (see WP:SURNAME)
 * 3) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * A fair few dead links. See if some of these have been archived at [waybackmachine.org the Wayback Machine] or WebCite
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * While the election is well-discussed, there is no analysis of campaign issues or breakdown of results. I suspect this is because there is no coverage of this in reliable sources, but just thought I'd mention this in case you'd forgotten to look for it.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * File:Josh Wander.jpg is from YouTube, I assume from, which is not listed as released under a Creative Commons licence. I have nominated this file for deletion, and removed it from the article.
 * 1) *I think it would be helpful to move the picture of Ravenstahl down into the Democratic primary section; it is a bit bunched up with the infobox and sidebar, and the caption is more relevant to this section as well.
 * 2) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A solid pass against the GA criteria. I have made a few suggestions for further improvement above. Well done! Adabow (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) *I think it would be helpful to move the picture of Ravenstahl down into the Democratic primary section; it is a bit bunched up with the infobox and sidebar, and the caption is more relevant to this section as well.
 * 2) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A solid pass against the GA criteria. I have made a few suggestions for further improvement above. Well done! Adabow (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)